International Network for Traditional Building, Architecture & Urbanism
Click to return to home page

AU - CA - CU - DE - IE - IN - IR - IT - NG - NO - PL - RO - RU - UK - US


Home: Return to the front page Charter: The document that defines our work Join: Become an INTBAU member today

Partnerships: Working with INTBAU Contacts: Get in touch with INTBAU ICTP: Members of the INTBAU College of Traditional Practitioners are elected by their peers on the basis of five years traditional work of the highest quality
Donate now to support INTBAU projects worldwide
Donations handled securely by TheBigGive

INTBAU on Facebook
Payments powered by WorldPay

Building Sustainably, Profitably and Beautifully INTBAU-USA Symposium at the Traditional Building Show, Baltimore 11:00 am – 5:30 pm, 23 October 2009, Baltimore, MD USA INTBAU USA's 2009 symposium

Quicklinks:
Event website

INTBAU USA held a successful annual symposium at the TBEC conference in Baltimore on October 23, with detailed discussion of the current economic conditions, and what the trends suggest for the design and building environments in the future. We discussed a number of resources and opportunities now emerging. We also discussed the future of INTBAU and the USA chapter, and the desires of members for directions for the future. It was a very in-depth discussion, and a number of attendees expressed gratitude for the depth of the discussion.

Section I was on "defining the challenges," and was introduced by Clem Labine, publisher of Traditional Building magazine and chair of Restore Media. He discussed the "economic reset" under way, and the need for traditional designers and builders to take advantage of it. There is also a need for a "vocabulary reset" to shift the dialogue about heritage, from the negative perceptions that exist presently (gentrification, elitist, "boring," etc). And there is a need to build a stronger constituency for heritage, as witnessed by the incredible fact that no stimulus money was spent for historic properties ($55 million was in fact cut!)

Michael Mehaffy discussed the "new normal" in economics – lack of credit, collapse of sprawl development, need for a green economy etc. The need to identify and champion existing research that shows the compelling benefits, and the great problems with a purely "green bling" approach -- and push that argument into the public discourse. And to commission additional research and an "evidence-based" approach, so that the true sustainability benefits of traditional design, building and heritage are recognized.

Mehaffy noted we will identify a series of emerging resources that can be used by attendees, and these are being assembled on the website www.tectics.com.

Steve Mouzon discussed the link between lovability and sustainability, and the other qualities of sustainable buildings, showing the link to traditional design. What is it that makes a building or place lovable at a local level, by local people? The patterns may come from elsewhere, but they are fitted to the need and unique characteristics of each place. And people will build mostly for themselves. That makes for tremendous variety, but within a narrow range, which establishes a unique local identity.

An extensive discussion period followed, where panelists discussed the qualities of local traditions, and how they embody sustainable characteristics – repairability, by local people (providing local jobs, and a local economic "multiplier effect"); adaptability to new uses; use of locally available materials, often much more ecologically benign (e.g. stone, wood, brick, earth); ability to weather well; ability to endure and prove their ability to be cared for and re-used (as opposed to an experimentalist approach). Some attendees brought up the Secretary of the Interior standards and the problems with that; we discussed new thinking about the Venice Charter, including INTBAU's Venice Declaration of 2006.

Seabrook, Duncan McRoberts

After a lunch break, a number of presenters gave case studies of projects that are taking on various aspects of this challenge.

Kyriakos Pontikis showed his use of "generative pattern languages" to engage residents and students in the process of building, integrating design with building.

Selena Anders presented Krupali Uplekar's paper on new trends in ecological traditional architecture, from a global context of rapid urbanization, population growth and resource pressures.

Joanna Alimanestianu showed a project in rural Ecuador that combined local patterns with outside ones, and used permaculture concepts to achieve a much more benign, ecological rural development model. It also used Transect-based planning to create an "agricultural urbanism" pattern, seeking to meet ambitious social, economic and environmental objectives.

Denis Hector showed a project in Miami that restored an existing historic building and also added a compatible new building, establishing new boundaries in interpretation of the Secretary of the Interior standards.

Gersil Kay showed challenges of retrofits of clean energy systems, with a focus on lighting, and demonstrated how such retrofits can go wrong.

The attendees then gathered for a final discussion. The question was posed to attendees:

What advantages do you see in the global resources of INTBAU? What activities would you like to see developed or added?

  • More opportunities for discussion and networking – e.g. perhaps a US-specific listserv.
  • More news and alerts about what is going on – perhaps peer-to-peer info exchange. (A wiki?)
  • Lobbying – esp. on priorities for heritage and regeneration, stimulus spending, etc.
  • More crafts training – both for craftspeople learning the art of design-build, and for architects learning the value of crafts. And both learning to work together in collaboration!
  • Certification –create something like Angie's List, etc.? (Opportunity for partnering with Restore Media?) It was felt this is a good idea and would be valuable to members, if the pitfalls could be avoided.
  • Opportunities for study courses overseas, and other networking with other chapters.
  • More explicit partnerships and partnership collaborations – e.g. New Urban Guild, and house plans, etc.
  • Education for young people – pressing on them the importance of heritage, and the value and potential satisfaction of a career in crafts.

    - Mike Mehaffy

    Further information

    Michael Mehaffy
    Chair
    INTBAU USA
    333 South State Street, Suite V-440
    Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034
    USA
    Tel: +1 (503) 756-1595
    Address

    All rights reserved INTBAU UK Ltd a registered charity no 1132362 © INTBAU 2001-10
    A company limited by guarantee no 6861677 and registered in England and Wales
    Registered office 19-22 Charlotte Road London EC2A 3SG